More handwriting on the wall
In an ongoing labor dispute, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation locked out 5,300 employees represented by the Canadian Media Guild. What do locked out broadcasting employees do in this day and age? Well, these enterprising folks launched their own Website, CBC Unplugged, and are offering programming via podcast.
Missing your favourite CBC Radio show?
Now, re-connect with their favourite personalities and shows. Some producers are making unofficial replacement shows and you can listen to them here.
This site is neither affiliated nor endorsed by either the CBC or the CMG.
Look, we all love our jobs and want to be back at our jobs soon and put the programming you love back on the radio. In the meantime, I hope this helps.
(Thanks, Steve.)
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Newspapers streaming video, chapter 3,672
This one should make TV news people shiver. The Knoxville News Sentinel is using little Sony Cybershot DSC-P93 cameras ($300) to make videos for its Website. Take a look at this one shot at, of all places, a shooting range.
Firstly, this is not even a “real” video camera, or is it? Granted, it’s not broadcast quality video, but it works just fine in a smaller, online resolution. And what will it be like five years from now? The point is people in the industry are bitching about what my clients are doing in Nashville with the VJ concept of newsgathering, when a newspaper (probably more than one) is putting simple pieces like this online with what looks like a still camera.
Secondly, let me repeat what I’ve said a million times. The local newspaper is beginning to compete with television stations (and lots of everyday folks) for the video news niche in your market. TV executives simply cannot overlook what’s happening here.
(Thanks to Glenn Reynolds, who uses the same kind of camera.)
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
New TV Website concept
I may be late to the game on this one, but have you seen Living.com, The Video Magazine? Very nice integration of video-on-demand with ads from the folks at Scripps Networks (with all those lifestyle cable channels) and the creative team at EAT TV.
I like this, because it doesn’t pretend to be anything other than what it is — a video magazine. No endless links and archaic attempts to drive page views through meaningless links (who wants to be driven?). All ads are video, and they’re limiting the length of the spots so as not to insult users. Scripps Networks has tons of content to repurpose for this, and they can use their networks to promote it (which is how I found out about it last night).
Wake up, everybody, and welcome to the continuing saga of Internet video.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Mainstream advertising decline continues
Nikki Finke of LA Weekly writes that Hollywood is about to tell major market newspapers that it’s going to cut back considerably on those big movie ads in the entertainment section. The reason? Not much bang for the buck. Newspaper readers aren’t the movie-going type anymore.
All advertisers dearly love the 18-to-34 demographic, and the Hollywood movie studios are no exception. In their eyes, the newsosaurs aren’t measuring up. Sources at the two Hollywood studios who are axing their movie display ads in newspapers gave me that information on the condition they not be identified. But, studiowide, it’s on everyone’s to-do list. “We’re rethinking our newspaper ads and I mean, literally, on every movie. Everybody is,” one movie mogul tells me. “The only people who read newspapers are older and elitist. Movies like Sky High don’t need ads in The New York Times. But the studios did it because newspapers were seen as a necessary evil. But I don’t think it’s as important anymore.”
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Water in the FCC’s pot is getting hotter
I don’t like this “educational/informational” (E/I) bug that the FCC is mandating for local broadcasters during certain children’s programming. Bad ideas often sound very noble up front, and I don’t question the intentions of those who made the rule. The agency requires that broadcasters provide a minimum of three hours a week of educational programming for children, so that bureaucrats and advocacy groups can feel good about themselves. Nothing wrong with that.
I’m one of those people who doesn’t think we need an FCC anymore — at least not in its current manifestation — and I sure hate some outside special interest group mucking up MY television signal. And the question to me is what comes next? Are we going to force broadcasters to put content ratings’ bugs on all programming? That’ll “help parents” keep their kids from watching all the naughty stuff out there. This elitist crap drives me batty — that we’re so stupid that we need big brother to keep our children from harm. Augh!! A simple bug today leads to many bugs tomorrow. We’re like the proverbial frog in the pot of hot water.
Nowhere does the law of unintended consequences work more efficiently than through the bureaucracy of our federal government. And it strikes me as odd that those (who used to be) most outspoken about big government and its cloying interference in our everyday lives are now the very people behind an activist FCC.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
The death of the joke
Nowhere has the rise of political correctness influenced western life more than in its humor. A lot of sociologists blame this on postmodernism, but I think it’s just the opposite. The rules of PC are a fruit of modernity, and its obsession with cause and effect.
Michael Bywater spells it all out in a wonderful cover story in the latest issue of Britain’s New Statesman.
Comedy is thriving as never before, but not jokes. Jokeworld is increasingly deserted, like a faded resort. It was a small place, Jokeworld, thinly populated but heterodox, with far more than its fair share of Jews (including God), Irishmen, Pakistanis, bartenders, judges, performing dogs, viola players, hookers, blondes and doctors. And now its day is done.
At its best, a joke can hurl complex information across the gap with extraordinary precision. It can offer a temporary respite from the anxieties of life, a break from its demand that we empathise, understand, be fair and non-judgemental. It can provide a recognition of our own absurdity, or a defusing of our secret fears.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
If you read ANY post today, make it this one
Jarvis Coffin, CEO of BURST! Media, has written an extremely insightful commentary for Online Media Daily that nails the old media/new media conflict in a way that broadcasters really need to understand.
The problem with big online editorial real estate, of course, is that it cannot overwhelm the countless smaller properties that exist today in a new media economy. Owning a media property does not have to be an expensive proposition anymore.…Until recently, the notion that big content counts for more eyeballs and more eyeballs count toward more revenue has been accepted as the norm. But against the backdrop of a giant ocean of unique Web destinations, how big does the opportunity of any one place appear? Once upon a time, if you owned NBC, you might well have appeared to own one-third of the opportunity inherent in television. No such appearance is possible today; mass audiences and their eyeballs are dispersing.
And remember, Mr. Coffin is head of one of the largest ad networks out there. We ought to be paying attention.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Broadcasters are “standing in the way”
I’m noticing more and more trade magazine articles these days that are telling it like it is for broadcasting. The types of things I used talk about to a room of blank stares are now getting head nods here and there, and I view this as a good thing for the industry. It’s like that wonderful IBM Consulting ad where the old king feels the change coming, but he’s the only one. Augh!
One writer who has always gotten it right is Diane Mermigas, about whom I’ve raved in the past. Her latest is hurt only by a bad headline, “Landscape changing for broadcast licensing.” Forget that and read the article. It’s important stuff, folks.
In a world of diffused content offerings and fragmented viewing, the onus is on network-affiliated broadcasters to innovate and produce unique content from their local resources and connections that cable, satellite and other distributors will want enough to pay for. (Emphasis mine)…But with television becoming only one, albeit important, spoke in the multimedia wheel, broadcast and cable players are beginning to see the possibilities for leveraging the value of their content elsewhere. They must.
…In a world in which consumers can increasingly access precisely what they want, on the device and in the location they chose, for the price they want to pay, the ability to use, repackage and market content to meet users’ higher customization, personalization and functionality standards gets you a lucrative seat at the big table. But playing that game means changing relationships at every level of the media and entertainment supply and demand food chain — from content distributors, providers and producers, as well as advertisers and marketers.
Diane has a nice quote from Disney CEO-elect, Robert Iger:
“We can’t stand in the way, and we can’t allow tradition to stand in the way, of where consumers can go or want to go.”
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Murdoch’s Web strategy is proof of his genius
BusinessWeek has a must-read summary of Rupert Murdoch’s vision of bringing his Fox media empire into the 21st century, and I have to admit that he’s right on the money. You can say all you want about the guy, but he’s generally managed to make the right moves when it comes to business, and this is no different. Every television station management group needs to burn these paragraphs into their minds:
“There is no greater priority for the company today than to meaningfully and profitably expand its Internet presence and to properly position ourselves from the explosion in broadband usage that we’re now starting to see,” Murdoch said.…During his conference call with investors, Murdoch explained his desire to create “an original type of portal.” As technology improves and users become more sophisticated, they won’t need portals such as AOL, MSN, or Yahoo to navigate the Web. Already, they’re able to find their own way around, using increasingly powerful search engines to locate what they want. The key will be allowing users to customize their experience of the Web, drawing on the vast resources of News Corp. and the Internet at large.
“Our strategy is quite simple,” Murdoch said. “News Corp. at its core is about content. The Web at its core is about personal choice. What we are aiming to do is combine the two, and in the process redefine the meaning of [an] Internet vertical.”
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Separating the old from the new
A new report by investment banker Veronis Suhler Stevenson (VSS) estimates that new media accounted for 16.7 percent of all advertising spending last year — up from only 10.3 percent in the report’s baseline year, 1999. As Joe Mandese at MediaDailyNews reports, accelerating change in the media world “has effectively reached a “new order” that shifts power to consumers from advertisers, and to new media from traditional media.”
VSS says the forces driving change are clear: the expansion of digital media technologies, the shift toward consumer control of media–especially media supported primarily by consumer spending–and a shift toward greater ROI in marketing that is driving advertisers to use greater shares of new media.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
When the formula doesn’t work
Peter Johnson at USAToday tells us that neither ABC nor CBS are in a hurry to replace their primary anchors, and — more importantly — that ratings haven’t changed for either network since Rather stepped down and Jennings departed to do battle with the lung cancer that eventually killed him. We saw this same thing when Brian Williams replaced Tom Brokaw last year as NBC’s primary anchor.
According to conventional TV news wisdom, this should not be happening. When Williams replaced Brokaw, viewers “should” have drifted to Rather or Jennings. Now that they’re gone too, viewers “should” be drifting to Williams. So what’s going on?
Firstly, the development and promotion of the anchors has always been the top strategy of any TV news organization. Network evening news broadcasts even included the name of the anchor as part of the program’s title, something I’ve always wondered about. In TV, when the ratings go up, the anchors get bonuses; when the ratings go down, the anchors get fired. Live by the anchor, die by the anchor. In truth, much of the entire news consulting business is built on the concept of making people with certain cosmetic attributes into bigger-than-life celebrities, so that people will “love” them and become or stay loyal to “their” programs. Over the years, this was a key factor in shifting the focus away from the news itself and onto the people presenting the news. It was easy, and it worked — or so we thought.
But viewing habits are complex and multi-faceted, and formulas for “capturing a news audience” through anchors restrict possibilities and limit creativity. These formulas have also ruined lives and created the payroll disparity that exists in newsrooms today.
And now we have evidence that viewers are, once again, smarter than our formulas. Who knew?
This will be interesting to watch.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Only 11 percent of blog readers use RSS (or not)
Steve Rubel first alerted me to this news from the Internet measuring folks at NielsenNetRatings.
“While RSS is an established technology, the growing popularity of blogs has catapulted RSS into the spotlight as a content personalization tool,” said Jon Gibs, senior research manager, Nielsen//NetRatings……The majority of respondents to the survey were less familiar with RSS feeds. Among the other respondents, 23 percent understood RSS but did not use it, while 66 percent either did not understand the technology or had never heard of it.
We surveyed MegaPanelists who read blogs, and of those MegaPanelists, 1,000 responded to our survey. As noted in the press release, a Weblog reader is defined as any blog site visitor who claims to have read blogs regularly or occasionally.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Events and such
Fellow new media consultant Tom Parish has posted a Podcast with yours truly. If you’re interested in hearing me drone on, here’s the link.
I’ve been invited to participate in what will be a very big event for me. On September 28, 2005, the Museum of Television & Radio’s Media Center will host the latest of its signature Dialogue events, titled The Intersection of Blogging and Mainstream News. On the 20-person panel with me will be Jeff Jarvis, Andrew Heyward, President of CBS News, Jon Klein, President of CNN, and Paul Steiger, Managing Editor of the Wall Street Journal. They apparently need an antagonist, so they chose me. Should be heaps-o-fun in the big apple.
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
The Unbundled Zone
(Cue Twilight Zone theme music)
Here is the world of Elmer Bundle, a man like any other man in any town anywhere. A job. A family. And wants and needs that shape the existence that he calls life. On this day, however, Mr. Bundle’s hum-drummery is about to take a side road — into a place where time and space aren’t what they seem — and life itself is turned upside-down — presented for your edification and entertainment — a place that we call The Unbundled Zone.
The scene is the neighborhood grocery store, where Elmer has purchased food for his family every week for 30 years. Only this day, something is different — so different that Mr. Bundle’s world will never be the same.
“What’ll it be today, Mr. Bundle,” asked Julie the clerk.
“Oh just the usual, Julie. I need a couple of bags of groceries and a bag of meat.”
“You’re funny,” she laughed. “Now, really; what can I do for you today?”
Elmer looked puzzled. “What do you mean? I said I need two bags of groceries and a bag of meat. I’ve bought the same thing here every week for the past 30 years.”
“Mr. Bundle, are you alright?”
“I’m FINE,” he retorted angrily. “Now, give me my food, and I’ll be on my way.”
“But, Mr. Bundle, what do you want in the bags?”
Bundle stood there, stunned by the question. Sweat began to emerge on his forehead, and he turned to survey the store. “What do you mean, what do I want in the bags? I want the usual, the way I’ve always done it.” He backed away and looked down the aisles of stacked food and goods. Gone were the people in the white jackets — professional food packagers — who were always busy filling the bags for awaiting customers. They were replaced by, well, the customers themselves, each pushing a large wagon made of thick wire. Into the wagons, the people put one of these and two of that, and they all seemed happy to do so.
Elmer began to tremble. “Wha, what’s going on here?”
How can these people decide for themselves? What about nutrition? What about spoilage and disease? What about new things that come along and all that fancy packaging? Do they really think they know what’s best for them? I come to this place, because I trust THEM to get it right for me.
“Can I help you, Mr. Bundle?” came a voice he recognized as belonging to Jack, the manager.
“Jack, Jack,” he rushed to meet him. “What IS this? What’s going on? I need my food for the week — my two bags of groceries and one bag of meat.”
“What are you talking about, Elmer? If you need some food, just grab a shopping cart and go get what you need.”
“But, Jack,” Bundle answered anxiously, “when did you change all this? I was just in here last week and everything was fine.”
“We haven’t changed anything,” the manager put his hand on Bundle’s shoulder and replied. “Can I get you a glass of water?”
Elmer Bundle stood there in stunned silence. His eyes bugged out, and sweat continued to dampen his face and neck. All he wanted was the usual, bags of groceries filled by the professional people in the white coats. Some of the items he liked, others he didn’t, but it didn’t matter, because that was just the way it was. His family saved the cans of lima beans to give to the poor at Christmas time, just as his father’s family had done, and his father’s before him. The mere thought that he might have to participate in the process was too much to comprehend, but the people in the store seemed to be doing just fine.
Confused and frightened, he stood there paralyzed. He didn’t see the ambulance arrive outside the store, and soon two men in white coats appeared behind him with a stretcher.
(Cue music)
Trapped between what was and what is to be, Elmer Bundle went insane. Unable and unequipped to deal in a world where personal choice evolved from that which was predetermined, he fell apart. So it is today — with media — in The Unbundled Zone.
(Cross-posted at The Morph Blog)
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
While the RIAA fiddles, the music empire burns
I love living in Music City. When people outside the area ask me about living here, I tell them, “Imagine every church having a fantastic band.” And it isn’t just country music that’s represented here. Every waiter or waitress is a budding song-writer, and a lot of the major rock bands find support people here.
That’s why this excellent article by the Associated Press caught my attention this morning (Thanks, J.D.).
The story offers an in-depth look at the do-it-yourself music industry that’s budding in the wake of the homogenized “guaranteed hit” formulas of the major record labels. This grassroots effort is an excellent illustration of what’s taking place in our culture overall, and all forms of media need to be paying attention.
How are all these aspiring musicians marketing their product? The Internet has been a huge boon, because it allows cheap, direct distribution of music to — and communication with — fans. Practically every artist now has an official Web site, most offering free MP3 downloads, and they maintain e-mail lists to promote upcoming shows and releases. Many musicians also sign up with services that license their songs to pay-per-download sites like iTunes.A growing number of DIY bands have also begun to license their songs to television. The popularity of youth-oriented shows such as “Scrubs,” “Everwood” and “The O.C.” has created a burgeoning demand for music to be used in the background of scenes or over closing credits.
Aw c’mon, Terry. You can’t seriously think a bunch of garage bands will take over the music industry, can you?
Well, we can’t necessarily think that they won’t either? And the point is that this same model is rising up for frustrated video producers as well. Anything that releases the monopolistic grip that the entertainment industry has on creativity is a very healthy thing.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
The asterisk to the Jennings story
National Journal columnist Bill Powers offers an important perspective today on the big media’s use of Jennings’ death as a vehicle for advancing the story of the death of network news. Here’s the doomsday scenario being presented: “The happy Golden Age of the Anchors is over, and we have entered the dark and dangerous Time of Chaos.”
By tying Jennings’s death to the networks’ gloomy future, we imply that somehow he and his fellow anchors failed. After all, while the three of them were still on the job, a huge swath of the public drifted away from the networks and almost certainly will never return again. The chairs they recently vacated are much smaller, figuratively speaking, than they used to be. It’s as if Brokaw, Jennings, and Rather took Captain Cronkite’s wonderful ship and sailed it straight to the bottom of the ocean.But they didn’t do that. The anchors are not at fault for the disintegration of the old, centralized media. And this new landscape of news that’s rising before our eyes isn’t a failure. To the contrary, it’s an evolutionary advance. At the moment, it’s hard to see this, because we’re still adjusting to the new reality of hundreds of channels and thousands of blogs. It can feel overwhelming, which is why it’s only natural that Americans born before about 1980 miss the era when networks were king; it’s what we grew up with, and in retrospect, it seems so much simpler.
Earlier this week, I heard from a colleague I used to work with 30 years ago. “No retirement possible,” he wrote, “perhaps ever. My career was ‘reassigned’ and resulted in a step backwards.” This is the lot many face in this volatile industry, so the anxiety, I believe, is valid.
But Powers’ point is that we’re entering a new age of media that will have its “own bold and brilliant figures, its own voices of reason and gravitas.” These are exciting times, but we’re in a season of transition now, one that demands new skillsets and ways of thinking.
We’ll all be okay, if we can just get past the anxiety.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Technorati going mainstream?
B. L. Ochman and others are reporting that Technorati is about to be sold to a large search engine company. Let’s see, that would be Google, Yahoo! or Microsoft.
Good for Dave Silfry. He’s been at this a long time and it would be nice to see somebody in the blog space get a fat payday.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
The lobby is my kitchen
Speaking of polls, the folks at Harris Interactive asked Americans about their moviegoing habits and found that nearly a third have gone to fewer movies in the first half of this year than the same period a year ago. Why?
| Total (n=709) | |
| Shift to Home Entertainment (Net) | 66% |
| Movies come out on DVD so quickly now, I don’t mind waiting. | 36 |
| I’m watching more movies that I rent on DVD. | 33 |
| I’m watching more movies that I own on DVD. | 20 |
| I’m watching more television. | 16 |
| My home entertainment system has gotten much better in the last year. | 14 |
| I’m watching more movies through Video on Demand | 10 |
| Dissatisfaction with theatrical experience (Net) | 53 |
| Ticket prices have gotten too high. | 49 |
| I don’t like the advertising before the movies at the theatre. | 14 |
| Time Constraints (Net) | 44 |
| I just haven’t had the time this year. | 40 |
| I’m spending more time traveling or on vacation this year. | 5 |
| The new movies this year haven’t been as good. | 35 |
| Other | 8 |
Interesting stuff, methinks. I know I haven’t gone to many movies this year. The cost is one thing, but I REALLY despise the practice of ads before the previews. We don’t watch a lot of DVDs, but our Comcast Video-On-Demand is the biggest reason for that. Times are changing, folks.
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Web surfing at work
The biggest opportunity for local media companies to build brand or audience is during the work day. A Magid study a year ago revealed that 63% of those who go to news Websites do so while at work.
The idea of employees surfing the Web at work is a controversial one, but the career information people at Vault, Inc. have just finished a study on the subject that helps provide some hard numbers.
- 87% of employees surf non-work-related websites while at work, and of this 87%, 53% engage in personal web surfing every day.
- A majority of employees (56%) do not worry about their email or Internet use being monitored at work.
- Only 35% of employees believe that surfing the Internet or sending non-work-related emails decreases productivity.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Online ad spending about to accelerate
$19 billion seems like a lot of money until you put it next to $30 billion.
Jupiter Research released their latest online ad projections this week, and the numbers ought to make anybody sit up and take notice. They’re saying online ad spending will increase to $18.9 billion by 2010. They’re also predicting a move away from banners and toward streaming, something I tend to agree with.
A few months ago, Forrester Research projected the 2010 number would be even better: $26 billion.
But when it comes to online advertising numbers, I like the methodologies and analysis of Borrell Research of Virginia. Borrell has been working on projections for online ad spending through its newly created 400-member panel of ad executives, and their current thinking is that online advertising will surpass $30 billion in 2010. Borrell stresses that these preliminary estimates are “in the ballpark” and that it will not publish its official estimates until early September.
Among many other techniques, Borrell is using a methodology call a Delphi Panel, which is similar to a large focus group. It’s used to generate ideas and facilitate consensus among individuals who have special knowledge of the subject being studied, but who are not always in contact with each other. Gordon Borrell told me, “This is some pretty exciting stuff that will help us be very, very accurate in our projections, by asking the very people who are doing the buying and selling of online advertising.”
Much of this new growth will be in local advertising. And if you can stand another prediction from me, I suspect people will begin figuring out the unbundled media revenue models within the next couple of years, so these numbers could be even higher. If and when online advertising crosses the $30 billion barrier, it will be competitive with all other forms of contemporary advertising.
Of course, everything will be up for grabs when all media converge in your set-top box…
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »