Archive for June, 2006

Southwest is a bit dingie

Posted Sunday, June 18th, 2006

Dear Southwest Airlines,

I fly you guys a lot, and I had a wish to communicate something to you that I thought would be helpful. So I went to your Website only to discover that you don’t accept emails. You say it’s because you want to be able to give people good customer service.

Right.

Now, while I prefer your airline above others, I think this is just marketing crap. You don’t accept e-mail, because you find it more efficient to handle snail mail and telephone calls. That’s fine, but let’s be honest about it. Haven’t you guys heard that we’ve entered the digital age? Or does that just apply to your own efficiencies?

I don’t write snail mail anymore. I do have this little blog with which I can share certain annoyances with the world. That’s what I’m doing right now, because, well, you only want to hear from me on your terms.

I was going to tell you that this “Ding” program of yours would a lot more useful as an RSS feed, rather than forcing people to download yet another bloody application. Have your assistant call my assistant, and we’ll talk about it sometime.

Yours Truly,

A. Customer

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

BloggerCon IV

Posted Sunday, June 18th, 2006

I’ll be San Francisco bound on Thursday for this weekend’s BloggerCon IV, and I’m really looking forward to one session in particular. Jay Rosen is leading a discussion about how all of journalism can work together in a paradigm where “the audience knows more than we do.” This strikes at the heart of much of my philosophy, and I’m most interested to see how the session plays out. As he has done before, Jay has posted his thoughts on the matter as a prelude to the event. The discussion is interesting, and I encourage you to check it out. Here’s what I wrote:

This topic is of great interest to me, but I think to accomplish your goals, Jay, we’re going to have to step back even further. I find that defining terms is absolutely necessary to have this kind of intellectually creative conversation, for one’s concept of “citizen journalism” is very often different than another’s. Even the use of the term “story” is problematic in this discussion, and perhaps we need to be thinking about another term for the output of such a decentralized and collaborative effort.

In our world, we end up on “sides,” because, well, there really are (at least) two sides to every story. It’s often written that the victor in war gets to write the history, and anybody who’s ever been through a divorce knows well and good that there are two sides in that “story.” So I think that we have to get past this in order to truly come to a place where the wisdom of the crowd is presented. Frankly, if we accomplished nothing more than this, it would be better than what we have today.

I’m quite excited about the possibility of telling the nation what’s really in its laws, but along with that, I think the nation needs to know who makes the laws and how those laws usually help the status quo within which the lawMAKERS exist. And while we’re at it, the nation also needs to know that “case law” was never a part of the separation of powers, and that the citizenry has little control over those who make this kind of law.

We have terrible problems in the West, and it’s going to take all of us working together to fix them. Modernism and its institutions have failed. What comes next?

If you’re going to be there, please come up and introduce yourself if we’ve not met before.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Off to Chicago…

Posted Friday, June 16th, 2006

…for a client meeting and to do some writing along the way. Lots of things going through my head right now. Stay tuned…

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

WARNING: Netscape goes Digg

Posted Thursday, June 15th, 2006

We need to pay attention to the underlying message in the new AOL/Netscape (currently in Beta). Brand actually does matter online, and the strategies and tactics of amazing start-ups that tap the media 2.0 paradigms can be duplicated by brands more established with the masses (and have more money). This is a pretty big story, and I hope local broadcasters can understand what’s taking place.

Digg is one of the more popular 2.0 applications, an aggregator site where “stories” are ranked by user popularity. A high ranking on Digg means LOTS of traffic, so newer versions of blog software carry a “Digg this” link to make it easy for users to post the story on Digg. It’s a terrific model that exists, to a great extent, outside the realm of “most” people.

So along comes the “new” Netscape, and guess what? It’s a clone of Digg, and that’s being kind. Rip-off would be a better term, and I hate what’s happening here. But there’s a lesson for broadcasters struggling against the Media 2.0 disruption. You can and SHOULD be creating 2.0 applications that meet the news and information needs of local audiences, and this Netscape-copy-Digg story is a lesson in how to do that.

And let’s not forget who’s behind this. That would be one Jason Calacanis of Weblogs, Inc. fame, and the same fellow who’s launching local news aggregator sites to tap the local revenue that rightly belongs in the market. You think this new Netscape venture won’t do the same? When will local media companies stop playing ostrich with people like this?

MUST READS:

TechCrunch: AOL-Netscape Launches Massive ‘Digg Killer’

New York Times: AOL to Turn Netscape Site Into a Newspaper of Sorts

Basement.org: All Sorts Of Drama In The Digg World

Steve Rubel: First Look: Netscape’s Hybrid Journalism Site

CNet News: New Netscape.com focuses on news

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Celebrating one-way “relationships”

Posted Thursday, June 15th, 2006

There’s new research about RSS and e-mail that’s been floating around for a few days that bears close examination. It comes from the Nielsen Norman Group, a research and consulting group that promotes itself as offering “strategies to enhance the user experience.”

The members of Nielsen Norman Group are user experience pioneers…they advocated user-centered design and usability before it became popular to do so.
The group is headed by Jakob Nielsen, “The Guru of Web Page Usability,” according to the New York Times.

Normally, that introduction wouldn’t matter, but in this case it does, because this research isn’t at all about internet users — it’s about the best way to SELL to internet users, which makes it a little odd coming from people who purport to represent the best interests of users.

“When your message appears in somebody’s RSS newsreader, it has a diminutive footprint that’s rubbing shoulders with a flood of headlines from other sites,” said Jakob Nielsen, co-founder and principal of Nielsen Norman Group, “Newsletters are a much more powerful medium than RSS feeds, and I would not be surprised if it turns out that companies make 10 times as much money from each newsletter subscriber.”
The conclusion is that RSS feeds are no substitute for e-mail newsletters. Well, duh!

Rich Ziade at basement.org offers four points:

  • I’m not sure it’s fair to compare RSS to e-mail just yet. I can’t imagine very many people are subscribing to ecommerce newsletters via RSS these days. The work habits around RSS as business marketing aren’t fully baked…yet.
  • A critical shortcoming of just about every RSS reader or aggregator is that all content looks the same. Why do I still visit CNN and techmeme on the web? Because the visual layout of the sites provide me with some context and cognitive guidance. Feed readers don’t. After all, all feeds are not created equal.
  • RSS is supposed to be a great push technology. But let’s be realistic. Nothing gets in our faces better than e-mail. We will inevitably go to our Inboxes. It will take much broader and deeper adoption before RSS comes near the attention level of e-mail.
  • Related to the last point, we are so committed to e-mail that we’re rewiring ourselves to handle and manage SPAM better. So while RSS comes to us free of noise and junk, we’re sticking by e-mail…for now.
Tobi Elkin wrote in yesterday’s MediaPost Online Minute that she’s not surprised by the study.
The Nielsen Norman report indicates RSS feeds aren’t substitutes for e-mail newsletters — and we tend to agree. The report goes on to elaborate that the fact that RSS feeds are immune to spam filters that often plague e-mail newsletters, doesn’t make them a better distribution medium for marketing communications. RSS feeds can be cold and don’t build relationships with customers as newsletters do.
Okay, let’s remember that these people — including the usability guru — are all talking about the ability of marketers to reach people with messages, and they’re comparing the penultimate push technology (e-mail) with the penultimate pull technology (RSS). Rich is just wrong about RSS being a form of push technology. From a user’s standpoint, RSS is a way to AVOID e-mail marketing, so what’s the big deal about this study? Money, that’s what.

But come on, Terry, these people are talking about legitimate newsletters that users have opted-in to receive. Well, not exactly, because this position assumes a purity of motive in the opting-in process, which some marketers are slowly turning into opt-out vehicles. There’s a lot at stake to the mass marketing world in the growth and development of RSS, and it would be foolish for marketeurs to wholeheartedly embrace it. RSS is unmistakably an opt-in technology, and the marketing world can ill-afford to endorse such a notion.

The guru concludes that businesses forge closer relationships with customers through e-newsletters than through RSS feeds. This, however, assumes that customers really want that relationship. I’m sorry, but the jury’s still out on that one.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Of robbing banks and broadcasting

Posted Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

Chris Anderson talks about his concept of “scaling down” in a provocative post this morning. He rightly states (he’s always right) that digital businesses can be efficient enough to deal at very small levels, and he adds, “a small percentage of a very large number can still be a big number.”

I call this “scaling down”, and it’s a core Long Tail competency. Traditional businesses target the top end of the market–the biggest hits and the richest customers–for the same reason that Willie Sutton robbed banks: because they think that’s where the money is. If you have only so many salespeople and only so many marketing dollars, such a discriminating approach makes sense. But the lesson of the Long Tail is that, as Nobel physicist Richard Feynman predicted, “there’s a lot of room at the bottom.”
This is why all this “web stuff” is so counterintuitive to broadcasters and other forms of mass media. They’re Willie Suttons all! The web’s a very different marketplace, and he who gets this will find business success downstream.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Thank you, Pandora

Posted Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

I’ve discovered a great band through Pandora that I want to share with everybody. Great Big Sea. The band’s lead singer, Alan Doyle, keeps a journal when they’re on-the-road, although it’s not officially a blog (I guess).

With Irish roots, I’m naturally (spiritually?) drawn to the sound of Irish music, but it would be a disservice to call these guys “Irish.” From Newfoundland, their music is pretty hard to describe, kind of melodic, sea shanty, powerful, Irish rock-n-roll. They have so much energy that the sound just leaps from the speakers and dances around the room, over and over again. I’ve yet to hear a bad song from GBS, and that’s saying something coming from me.

I LOVE this band, and I feel like I’ve just discovered a rich vein of gold.

But the story here isn’t the band; it’s the way I found them. I’ve written about Pandora before, and I want to restate that their methodology is the means by which we’ll overcome the pejorative “group think” that the pundits fear about the blogosphere and all things that relate to information distribution via the web. After I first wrote about Pandora, people commented that Last.fm was better. I think it’s a great site too, but their model of finding new music is based on the tastes of other people in the database who are listening to music similar to what you’ve chosen.

Call me a nut, but I think this can be manipulated, whereas Pandora’s algorithms are based solely on similarities to music styles that you’ve selected. Think about that for a minute. The algorithm can be created that’ll “read” your tastes in news and information and send more your way, and it wouldn’t be easy for big dollar institutional players to manipulate that.

I want to personally thank Tim Westergren and the folks at Pandora for opening these old ears to the sounds of a truly remarkable band in Great Big Sea.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

The high cost of dying

Posted Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

As most of you know, I’ve learned a lot about life without health insurance in the past few years. Last year’s breast surgery was the pits, but what I’m going to share with you now cannot possibly be topped.

A couple of weeks ago, three bills came in the mail. They were all addressed to Alicia Heaton, my Allie. I got a second statement from one of them yesterday.

Number one was from the paramedics:

$650 EMS transport
$ 15 mileage (yup)

Number two was from the Emergency Room Physicians group.

$1,600 for:
Emergency evaluation & management services
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
Endotracheal intubation, emergency procedure

Number three was from the hospital:

$1,958.06 for emergency services

In other words, my decision in the middle of a horrible crisis to call 911 resulted in charges of $4,223.06 even though she was pronounced dead on arrival.

Now, here’s the real nightmare. I knew Allie was dead when I found her on the bathroom floor. Her pupils were fixed and dilated and she was cold to the touch. I figure she’d been gone for at least two or three hours when I found her. Yet, I did what my instincts and training told me to do; I called 911. The operator was adamant that I perform CPR, so I did and waited until the experts got there. Those minutes were the longest of my life and the most horrible.

But you see, they (we) don’t teach you that there’s a price tag associated with the call. Nobody asks if you have insurance. And who in their right mind is going to ask if there’s going to be such charges anyway? You don’t do that. You just pick up the phone and call 911.

Insurance companies usually pick up these charges and nobody says “boo.” The hospital was gracious to give me the typical 30% discount for paying cash, and I suppose I should be grateful. I’m not.

Add to this the cost of the funeral, and I gotta tell ya, folks, dying ain’t cheap. And people wonder why I rail against the status quo!

And for those of you who’ve been asking, I’m hoping to learn how she died next week.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

A dream realized

Posted Tuesday, June 13th, 2006

These are the last days that my company will function independently as DONATA Communications. Beginning Thursday, I’ll be joining my old friend Jerry Gumbert and his innovative company, Audience Research and Development of Dallas. Six great minds make up the core of AR&D, and I’m honored to now be in their midst.

AR&D has acquired DONATA as a part of the deal, and we’ve yet to decide what will happen to the name. Let’s hope my little damselfly survives somehow.

AR&D is a leader in research and consulting for the local broadcasting industry, and we’re joining forces to take the vision of opportunity to local television. The company has been quietly percolating a vision for broadcasters that includes both the traditional and beyond, and by bringing me into the mix, it will explode on the industry this year. These are smart, smart people, and we’re putting the industry on notice today that there are real solutions to the real problems broadcasters face and that we have the model. We’re in a business cycle where stations must be amphibious and exist in two completely different worlds. It’s tricky and there are a lot of people who think you can be one or the other, but this is provably false.

I couldn’t be more excited, because Jerry is an old and trusted friend. I’ll be running AR&D’s Digital Development Unit. I also love the fact that the first word in AR&D is audience, because that’s the key to successful local media downstream. While most broadcasters are fixated on revenue, the real problem is audience. Money follows eyeballs, not the other way around (the Donald Trump exception noted).

And I will continue to assert that the biggest threat to local media companies is outside technology companies coming in to take advertising money out of the local market. Google didn’t start out as a media company, but they certainly have become one. Same with Yahoo and a legion of others. I’m sorry, but obsessing only with your slice of a shrinking broadcast pie is the road to the tar pits. Audience is the problem. Fix the problem!

One of the big things I’ll be bringing to the table is a knowledge of and comfort level with technology and technology companies. I think it’s important that TV stations move to tech platforms designed and built by cutting edge players instead of those with media backgrounds. This is what we did with WKRN-TV, and the things that are on the drawing board there will amaze you. I’ll be keeping my old clients, and that’s important to me.

As I said, this is an extreme honor for me but also for the vision that Allie and I shared and to which we dedicated our lives — with little compensation — during the two and a half years we were together. I know that she’s beaming with pride today, and that feels pretty nice.

Jerry and I have agreed that I will continue blogging and writing essays, although I need to be realistic about that. I’m entering the world of corporate secrets, and I think you know I’ll respect that. I do promise, however, that I won’t pull any punches and that I’ll try to remain as transparent as I always have. These are fascinating times we’re in, and I’ve no wish to be a part of the b.s. pool that’s already out there.

As I’ve shared so many times before, broadcasting is and was my life. I still have many friends who work in the industry, and I want to do everything I can to help local television remain viable for the long term. This isn’t just some fancy dream; it’s a real mission (I feel like the Blues Brothers), and by joining with the quality people, connections and resources of AR&D, I’ve moved beyond the “voice crying in the wilderness” phase. As Mike James wrote in NewsBlues today, “the nutty professor has gone legit.”

And I’ll have health insurance, what a concept!

Here’s the official press release.

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments »

When will they learn?

Posted Monday, June 12th, 2006

One of my sayings is “just because you can doesn’t mean you should.” I originally used it regarding video effects. Most young editors get enamored with effects, and if overused, they become INeffective and actually kill story flow and pacing. I’ve adopted the saying to include just about anything in life.

The folks out there running some of these disruptive advertising technologies could use a healthy dose of that lesson, because now even something as innocent as moving a mouse is considered permission to disrupt by many in the industry. It’s not, but that doesn’t matter in the quest to sell, sell, sell. And the people’s response? There’s now an extension for Firefox called Flashblock that will block all Flash on a page. Of course, this will ruin other legitimate uses of Flash, and all because advertisers are doing this stuff because they can.

The latest is from the good folks at Vibrant Media, whose early IntelliTxt technology linked keywords in web page text to little text ads when moused over. Now they’ve got a cute little video player that will run a video ad when users mouse over keywords.

Let me repeat. My mousing over your ad is not permission for you to disrupt my experience. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

Sheesh.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

CBS launches unbranded “Showbuzz”

Posted Monday, June 12th, 2006

Larry Kramer is a smart guy. The CBS internet czar launched a new site with a new brand today, one that, I predict, will do very well for the company. Showbuzz is an entry into the celebrity news space. The logic was simple: the entertainment section of the CBS site was always sold out, so they built a new site to increase inventory. Since I’ve been screaming for years that this is the way to go, I’m naturally going to like everything about this, mostly that it’s not covered with CBS branding or promotional hype. It’s a legitimate, separate news and information Website. USAToday’s Peter Johnson got the scoop.

By spinning out a new site devoted to entertainment news, CBS hopes to “create an environment where people who are interested in those things will go,” CBS Digital chief Larry Kramer says.

“The future of media companies, the future of the Web is about finding additional revenue streams for content you already have or to support the people who create that content,” Kramer says. In CBS News’ case, that amounts to about 1,500 employees who are involving in reporting news, much of it entertainment and pop culture features.

Sound familiar? Congrats to Mr. Kramer and his team.

(Hat tip to Cory Bergman)

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

A futuristic manifesto

Posted Monday, June 12th, 2006

Every once in awhile something comes along that epitomizes the phrase “must read.” This wonderful set of predictions by author, VC and futurist Geoffrey Moore falls into that category. I think he is spot-on in every one of his “Top Ten Truths about the Digital Ecosystem.” Here’s number four:

4. Everything is media. While advertising will not pay for everything, everything will become a potential opportunity to advertise. This means that at least some technology adoption life cycles can be short-circuited by providing the disruptive innovation for free.

If advertising is the default funder of digital offers, then consumption is the ultimate paradigm. Over time people and cultures will weary of this, and socially constructed content will become more pervasive as an escape from constantly being pitched.

So powerful is this set of “truths” that it could function as a downstream manifesto for anybody in the media world thinking about the digital tomorrow. Don’t miss it.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Big news in the blogosphere

Posted Sunday, June 11th, 2006

Robert Scoble is leaving Microsoft to return to Silicon Valley as a video blogger for start-up PodTech. According to its Website, “PodTech is a media company dedicated to podcasting. It is a producer, aggregator, and distributor of professional podcast content for audiences worldwide. Its media channels include PodTech News, PodTech InfoTalk™ Network, and PodTech Sponsorship Network.”

There are a lot of rumors flying around about Scoble being dissatisfied with Microsoft, but he’s adamantly denying them this morning. Regardless, this is a terrible blow to Microsoft, because Scoble has done more to soften their image with the tech community than any amount of money could’ve bought, and along the way, he’s written the book about corporate PR in the digital age.

Dave Winer is close to Scoble and suggests in his blog that there’s more to this than meets the eye:

It’s too bad Microsoft couldn’t bend more. I know that sounds arrogant, but I’m not modest about the changes brought about by blogging, RSS, podcasting, unconferences, etc. I’ve said it before, it’s not possible for Microsoft to embrace and extend this time, yet that’s how they’re playing it. It’s more likely to happen the other way, RSS will embrace and extend Microsoft, but I guess Microsoft is going to put that day off even further into its future. It’s already way late to acknowledge that the ideas that are shaping technology aren’t coming from Redmond, they aren’t even coming from companies.

A person like Scoble can have enormous influence just by adopting some very simple ideas. It’s the ideas that have power. But Microsoft hasn’t let the changes waft over them. They still think in old terms. I’m glad to see my old friend didn’t go down with the ship.

Nail Kennedy, a tech writer and guru who works with Scoble, says the new fit for Robert is perfect:
The news does not surprise me, as Scoble’s tour of corporate campuses and PR firms over the past year undoubtedly yielded some lucrative job offers. Working at PodTech allows Scoble to continue chatting about technology every day with executive clients of the corporate communication network. Scoble’s readership in the blogosphere will be a selling point for new clients. allowing them to have an amplified message in this new communication medium. PodTech is early stage and I’m sure Scoble has a good sized equity participation.
Why should anybody care about this, especially those readers of this blog firmly ensconced in the world of broadcasting? Anytime somebody of Scoble’s stature moves from big guy to little guy, there’s much more unsaid than said. This is a staggering loss for Microsoft, but for Scoble to leave to explore options as a video blogger ought to get the attention of the broadcasting community. If the Personal Media Revolution didn’t have a spokesperson before, it certainly has one now. It will be fascinating to watch what happens.

Congratulations, Robert. I’m sure we haven’t heard the last of you. Also, congrats to John Furrier, PodTech’s founder and CEO.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Time discovers The Long Tail

Posted Friday, June 9th, 2006

I may be late to this party on this, but here’s a “must read” article from the folks at Time Magazine. Long Tail’s Tribe is subtitled “HOLLYWOOD IS BUZZING WITH THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA THAT REAL OPPORTUNITY–AND PROFIT–LIES WELL BEYOND BLOCKBUSTERS” and is an excellent primer for those (broadcasters?) who don’t understand web economics. Time’s Jeffrey Ressner writes:

Anderson’s (Chris, creator of the term “long tail”) premise, once you accept it, is like a song you can’t get out of your head: you start seeing long tails everywhere. Microbrews become the long tail of beers, for example. Blogs are the long tail of journalism. Even porn has its version–the increasingly bizarre porn fetish sites that could be profitable only on the Web.
The more long tails you see, the more comfortable you become with the concept and, more importantly, the more you can see the long-tail opportunities for local media companies. Good stuff.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Can’t miss business idea

Posted Friday, June 9th, 2006

Live webcams, with audio, at 4-way stops. Constant entertainment. It needs a little work on who would pay for it, but…

(Around these parts, we’d say it’s more exciting than watching the flies gather around the gumball machine.)

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Linking and the law of attraction

Posted Friday, June 9th, 2006

Jeff Jarvis, David Weinberger, Jay Rosen and a host of other friends are at an event at Penn on our hyperlinked society. Jeff and David are live-blogging and both highlight the same concept from Jay, so it must be important. It is:

Jarvis: Rosen repeats his favorite quote, which I’ve quoted often in turn, from sociologist Raymond Williams: “There are no masses, there are only ways of seeing people as masses.” Jay says the age of mass media has lasted 300 years. He says we have whole industries of people engaged in regarding people as masses. He says these ways are all coming apart. So we need to see people “as a public, as a community, as knowledge producers as well as being consumers.” He said the mass media were very good as connecting people up to centers of power. Aha. And the internet connects us across, to each other. Welcome to the horizontal world.

Weinberger: Jay Rosen says that returns to Raymond Williams who says in Culture and Society: There are no masses. There are only ways of seeing people as masses. People are unique, but you can address them as a mass. The Age of Mass Media, says Jay, is about the art and science of seeing people as masses. But today all these ways of seeing people as masses are coming apart. They’re not as effective. People don’t stand for it any more. So now we have to learn how to see people not as a mass but as a public, a community, knowledge producers. Links connect us horizontally, not just up and down. “All the professions that specialize in seeing people as masses, or as the market, are having to contend with a world where horizontal communication is so much more effective.” Often, if people can meet each other, they don’t need the mass world, says Jay. And, as a blogger, he says, through the “magic of links” he was able to talk about the press without having to go through the filter of the press. “So, for me linking has been powerfully associated with intellectual freedom.”

This is a great topic, and I wish I were there. Linking is tied to the structure of the web, and it’s what makes it so fundamentally different from any other communications medium (misnomer). It’s also something mass marketers don’t really understand, because if they did, their strategies wouldn’t stress the one-to-many paradigm. Linking is a powerful weapon in the hands of the “mass,” a vote, if you will, for the page or reference that’s receiving the link. This is why the law of attraction is the essential marketing strategy of the web, not the law of attention.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

CBS moves to iTunes, Google deal “changing”

Posted Friday, June 9th, 2006

The CBS announcement yesterday that it would be selling programs via the iTunes model means changes for the network’s silly deal with Google Video. Remember that? CBS thought there was a market for “renting” their shows. Not! Well, Staci Kramer at PaidContent.org tracked down CBS Digital boss Larry Kramer who says, “We’re in active discussions with them (Google Video) about the next step.”

No details about what that might be but today’s move puts Google Video at a tremendous disadvantage to services like iTunes when it comes to a show like “CSI.” If you can pay $1.99 and keep the episode on your computer or download it to a device versus $1.99 for a day-pass download, how many people are going for the latter? And if you want an episode from earlier in the season, iTunes is your only online option. (The NBA also went with Google Video first, then signed a broader deal with iTunes.)
Staci also notes that iTunes has sold over 30 million videos since the concept first began last fall. Think about that for a minute, and also take note of the fact that those numbers are trending upwards. The more the networks unbundle themselves, the greater the loss for the local affiliates, whose core competency depends on fresh or first rerun network programming. A year from now, the iTunes number will be north of 500 million, and pretty soon the networks will begin selling first-run programs.

This is why network affiliates must move to diversify themselves locally, and not everybody’s going to survive. As I’ve said before, the internet is a land grab right now. Stake your claim first, and you have a significant advantage over those who snooze and lose.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Just give me the front section

Posted Thursday, June 8th, 2006

Here are some interesting little gems from yesterday’s MediaPost Research Brief:

Reading of the front section of daily newspapers in the top 87 markets has gone up, from 51.4 to 53.0 percent between 2000 and 2005. Meanwhile, readers of all other 11 section have gone down.

The severest decline in percentage of readers was in the weekend television guide book. Its percentage of readers dropped from 31.9 to 23.1 between 2000 and 2005 because it appears to be the most easily duplicated by other media.

Other section readership changes during this period include:

  • The Movie/Entertainment section readership dropped from 26.5 to 23.1.
  • Travel sections dropped from 19.6 to 17.7.
  • Lifestyle/Fashion dropped from 23.7 to 21.7.
  • Other sections lost about one percentage point.

Says Jordan (Bob Jordan, president of International Demographics, producer of The Media Audit), “Five years without growth is a substantial problem.”

I think what’s more important than the readership loss is the idea that people who do read the newspaper increasingly seem to want it all in the front section. This makes sense in light of what’s taking place in our culture (Remember, TIME is the new currency), and it also says a lot about how to perhaps structure a paper that might actually sell.

And perhaps there’s a lesson here for broadcasters, too.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Hyping a movie as “news”

Posted Thursday, June 8th, 2006

On yesterday’s ESPN Sportscenter program, actor Owen Wilson was on the “Budweiser Hot Seat” segment. That’s right. Owen Wilson. So what’s his claim to sports fame? He’s the voice of one of the cars in the new Disney/Pixar animated movie “Cars,” which is about a NASCAR-like racing circuit. Actors are nothing new to the hot seat, but Disney owns ESPN, and I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed a more obvious example of self-serving hype on television. The questions were inane, and the poor ESPN anchor knew it. Wilson seemed distracted and bothered, and in no way gave an indication that he was even on the famous hot seat.

Normally, I wouldn’t care, but this is the kind of stuff that’s killing the whole public trust news business. Sports isn’t news, you say? Well, that’s true (why are sports highlights “news” when the aberrance of the lowlights better qualifies them?), but Sportscenter is billed as a news program, and I’d wager the audience thinks it’s a news program. Here Disney muddies the trust factor by inserting a disinterested actor into a spot usually reserved for people with something to say in an effort to promote a movie that opens this weekend.

Sad.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Allie’s stuff

Posted Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

It’s been awhile since I got personal. A lot of people have been asking me how I’m doing, so I thought this might be a good time to tell you. I’m doing well and getting stronger with every week that goes by. I still don’t know her cause of death, and that hangs there like Damocles’ Sword. I won’t know ’till the end of the month.

This past weekend, our friend Holly and I filled a 20-foot dumpster with junk from the garage and house. My Allie was a packrat, and she’d dragged her “stuff” all over the place during her life. It wasn’t much, but it was hers, if you know what I mean. What it was, was boxes of papers and, well, stuff, most of which I was able to toss into the dumpster. I had to go through everything, because hidden in these boxes were little gems about her and her past that I have since woven into a memory book.

Here’s a bit of advice based upon my experience: If you have things you’d rather your loved ones not find, throw them away. This includes photos and letters involving old boyfriends and girlfriends, especially those that, well, you’d likely not display on the dining room table.

I bought a cedar chest and have stored the most precious items there. Her childhood treasure in the form of a tin of marbles. All of her writings. Her harmonica and the silly flute that drove me crazy. Her jewelry boxes and the small box of arrowheads that she collected over the years (she was part Cherokee). Articles of clothing that are special to me. Her television news awards. Her UT coffee cup. And much, much more.

This is a part of the process of letting her go, and the more I do these things, the farther away she seems. And while I would give anything for just five minutes with her, this seems right, because the pain is evolving into the memories that I choose to keep alive, and there’s nothing painful there.

So I’m doing better and I’ll be okay. Thanks for asking. It means more than you can imagine.

Posted in Allie | 1 Comment »