Terry Heaton’s PoMo Blog

  • Email Terry
  • RSS feed via Feedburner
  • What does this mean?

"Postmodernism is a change-or-be-changed world. The word is out: Reinvent yourself for the 21st century or die! Some would rather die than change." Leonard Sweet, cultural historian.

Cincinnati PBS station selling ads online

Well what do you know? Some Public Broadcasting people at the local level are getting the message. In a move that’s making noise in PBS circles, CET — the Public Broadcasting station in Cincinnati — has relaunched its website as an ad-supported Video on Demand portal.

“We anticipate the site to maintain its noncommercial feel and look,” said Susan Howarth, president and CEO of the 52-year-old CET. In light of this, Howarth added that the 501c3 nonprofit organization will be selective in its acceptance of ads on the new CETconnect.org site.

…Unlike CET television, the Web site does not fall under Federal Communications Commission guidelines barring advertising. Reportedly, PBS.org is reconsidering running paid advertising on its site, which has raised the ire of public media purists.

I’ve participated in a couple of Public Broadcasting conferences, and there is a willingness to explore creative solutions to funding problems. While this is a good thing for these stations, the message to all of us by this announcement is that the rules are different online. Watch for other PBS entities to explore completely off-brand “business” models downstream.

(Thanks to PaidContent)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 21st, 2006 at 7:56 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “Cincinnati PBS station selling ads online”

  1. Robert Jacobs Says:

    Public broadcasting has always been commercial.

    Whether the ads run throughout the program or labeled as "underwritten" and placed at the beginning and end of a broadcast, it’s still commercial.

    In fact, underwritten programs could be considered more commercial because of the potential impact if the primary sponsor is lost. Do you think these sponsor have more or less influence over content when compared to traditional commercial broadcasting?

    Why not join the rest of the broadcast world and work to find creative advertising revenue?

    The government should have stopped funding so-called public broadcast years ago.

Leave a Reply

Transparent Terry

Search Blog

Links to Page

Languages

Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese

My Blog Juice

Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!

Creative Commons License
With the exception of the essays entitled "TV News in a Postmodern World," all material created by Terry L. Heaton and included in this Weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.