<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foolish strategy by the networks</title>
	<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1107</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1107</guid>
					<description>Be patient, please, Kevin. If you don't subscribe to the station's local news RSS feed, you're missing the mere beginning of unbundling at WKRN.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be patient, please, Kevin. If you don&#8217;t subscribe to the station&#8217;s local news RSS feed, you&#8217;re missing the mere beginning of unbundling at WKRN.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1106</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1106</guid>
					<description>WKRN evidently shares the beliefs of NBC and CBS, as the videos at WKRN.com are not downloadable.

If it is a bad strategy for the networks, isn't it a bad strategy for WKRN?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WKRN evidently shares the beliefs of NBC and CBS, as the videos at WKRN.com are not downloadable.</p>
<p>If it is a bad strategy for the networks, isn&#8217;t it a bad strategy for WKRN?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sean coon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1105</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1105</guid>
					<description>here, here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here, here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1104</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1104</guid>
					<description>Chaos, like fear, is tissue paper disguised as a brick wall.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaos, like fear, is tissue paper disguised as a brick wall.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sean coon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1103</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1103</guid>
					<description>to expand on your point, terry, i'd say that we're way beyond browse, but we've yet to even touch discovery.

search results are still presented in a flat, paginated interface. clustering executions would greatly expose nuances of query lexicon, which would lead to a higher degree of discovery.

furthermore, the web's ability to leverage descriptors (tags) in decentralized ways are only beginning to take off.

basically, the more distribution points, the more opportunities for content to be found. if nbc really &lt;a href="//www.seancoon.org/2006/02/nbc_we_get_web_20_sike.html&#34;" rel="nofollow"&gt;thought out their move, they could've innovated a &#34;channel&#34; partnership with a youtube or a google&lt;/a&gt;. instead, they reverted to old media thinking of &#34;protecting their property.&#34;

it's 101 fear of pomo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to expand on your point, terry, i&#8217;d say that we&#8217;re way beyond browse, but we&#8217;ve yet to even touch discovery.</p>
<p>search results are still presented in a flat, paginated interface. clustering executions would greatly expose nuances of query lexicon, which would lead to a higher degree of discovery.</p>
<p>furthermore, the web&#8217;s ability to leverage descriptors (tags) in decentralized ways are only beginning to take off.</p>
<p>basically, the more distribution points, the more opportunities for content to be found. if nbc really <a href="//www.seancoon.org/2006/02/nbc_we_get_web_20_sike.html&quot;" rel="nofollow">thought out their move, they could&#8217;ve innovated a &quot;channel&quot; partnership with a youtube or a google</a>. instead, they reverted to old media thinking of &quot;protecting their property.&quot;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s 101 fear of pomo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1102</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1102</guid>
					<description>Roger, that's a fair and common question, but in the unbundled paradigm both the networks and other distribution sites win. Not so by forcing users into closed networks, which they simply won't use. We're so past the browse/discover phase of the internet.

The real question is why the networks have sat back and let others build various distribution portals without getting into the business themselves.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, that&#8217;s a fair and common question, but in the unbundled paradigm both the networks and other distribution sites win. Not so by forcing users into closed networks, which they simply won&#8217;t use. We&#8217;re so past the browse/discover phase of the internet.</p>
<p>The real question is why the networks have sat back and let others build various distribution portals without getting into the business themselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1101</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1101</guid>
					<description>great post.  Where's the business creativity on the part of the networks?  no reason they couldn't monetize as the content gets distributed.  It's also ironic that ex-corporate sister Comedy Central allows YouTube to distribute clips!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post.  Where&#8217;s the business creativity on the part of the networks?  no reason they couldn&#8217;t monetize as the content gets distributed.  It&#8217;s also ironic that ex-corporate sister Comedy Central allows YouTube to distribute clips!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1100</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1100</guid>
					<description>Why should networks allow the YouTube website to get free &#34;hits&#34; by using network programming?  YouTube would benefit, networks would not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should networks allow the YouTube website to get free &quot;hits&quot; by using network programming?  YouTube would benefit, networks would not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sean coon</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1099</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/foolish-strategy-by-the-networks/#comment-1099</guid>
					<description>yeah, i found that nbc move soooo dopey. that snl skit actually got me to watch snl after a 10 year hiatus. my return-to-boob eyeballs put money in their pockets on some level, and now they've lost me again.

executives really need more of your consulting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i found that nbc move soooo dopey. that snl skit actually got me to watch snl after a 10 year hiatus. my return-to-boob eyeballs put money in their pockets on some level, and now they&#8217;ve lost me again.</p>
<p>executives really need more of your consulting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
