<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP behind online. Here&#8217;s why.</title>
	<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ike</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-36513</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-36513</guid>
					<description>I was early, by one day: http://pages.citebite.com/k1m7r8s9m3hpt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was early, by one day: <a href='http://pages.citebite.com/k1m7r8s9m3hpt' rel='nofollow'>http://pages.citebite.com/k1m7r8s9m3hpt</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ike</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-36062</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-36062</guid>
					<description>Two alternative theories - on the grounds you might be over-thinking this:

1) Democrats have an edge in social media because of the natural edge in younger voters, just out of college.  More interest - more proclivity.  Conversely, there is less incentive and payoff for the GOP to spend a lot of resources going there, because its audience isn't there yet.

2) Random chance.  Two major parties, one is faster.  Flip a coin.

Now - my prediction:

Big fight for the "heart and soul" of the GOP.  Many dissatisfied Republicans waiting for a new Moses to lead them to the Promised Land.  BIG bonus to tip the scales for the candidate who solidifies the young (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two alternative theories - on the grounds you might be over-thinking this:</p>
<p>1) Democrats have an edge in social media because of the natural edge in younger voters, just out of college.  More interest - more proclivity.  Conversely, there is less incentive and payoff for the GOP to spend a lot of resources going there, because its audience isn&#8217;t there yet.</p>
<p>2) Random chance.  Two major parties, one is faster.  Flip a coin.</p>
<p>Now - my prediction:</p>
<p>Big fight for the &#8220;heart and soul&#8221; of the GOP.  Many dissatisfied Republicans waiting for a new Moses to lead them to the Promised Land.  BIG bonus to tip the scales for the candidate who solidifies the young (
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Volunteer Voters &#187; Adorno Explains The Political Digital Divide</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-34685</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-34685</guid>
					<description>[...] Some say the reason for this is somewhat ideological. The Republican Party values hierarchy and while the Democratic Party, always a disorganized and diverse lot, has seen these vices in the past become virtues in the digital age. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Some say the reason for this is somewhat ideological. The Republican Party values hierarchy and while the Democratic Party, always a disorganized and diverse lot, has seen these vices in the past become virtues in the digital age. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: !</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-34674</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/gop-behind-online-heres-why/#comment-34674</guid>
					<description>"another institution's failure to grasp the value of the web"

i'm trying to figure out to who the heck you refer. 

don't tell me... i'll figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;another institution&#8217;s failure to grasp the value of the web&#8221;</p>
<p>i&#8217;m trying to figure out to who the heck you refer. </p>
<p>don&#8217;t tell me&#8230; i&#8217;ll figure it out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
