Terry Heaton’s PoMo Blog

  • Email Terry
  • RSS feed via Feedburner
  • What does this mean?

"Postmodernism is a change-or-be-changed world. The word is out: Reinvent yourself for the 21st century or die! Some would rather die than change." Leonard Sweet, cultural historian.

Is this REALLY necessary?

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady is suing General Motors for $2 million, because they used his likeness in an ad a month after his contract had expired. Oh puh-leeeeze! This is the kind of crap that leaves a bad taste in the mouths of everybody, except the lawyers who’ll make lots of money off it. I mean, come on! Sure the agency that did the dastardly deed should be called on the carpet for it, but to actually file a $2 million lawsuit is absurd. Is there any wonder why pro athletes are thought of as spoiled brats?

Brady, you’re being a dick! (Note: The FCC says I can say that.)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 26th, 2005 at 4:32 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 Responses to “Is this REALLY necessary?”

  1. roboto Says:

    How long should he have given them free use of his likeness? Six months?

    If someone contracts to use something valuable of yours, say rental property, do you let them use it for longer than the contract period for free?

    Yes, though, I am a lawyer.

  2. Terry Says:

    God bless the lawyers, Roboto. I just think a $2 million suit is a bit much. Here’s more:

    Cadillac, GM’s luxury brand, issued a statement Wednesday calling the suit “disappointing and shocking.”

    Jeff Kuhlman, a spokesman for the company, said Cadillac has been “actively engaging in settlement discussions,” and that company officials were not notified about the suit.

    “It was an honest mistake that we have attempted to reasonably resolve for the past year, however the settlement expectation of Mr. Brady’s agents has been unreasonable,” Kuhlman said.

    “For accidental use of Mr. Brady’s likeness following the 2004 Super Bowl, Mr. Brady’s agents are demanding more than 20 times the amount paid for use of Mr. Brady’s likeness for the entire regular season.”

  3. roboto Says:

    Having not seen the actual lawsuit, I bet that the high number is "punitive" damages, as a result of intentional conduct by GM. They asked him if they could run extra ads, he said no, and then they did anyway.

    An athlete generally has two assets: his talent and his likeness. To be the devil’s advocate, he had to sue them, because they stole from him. And he had to do it by January 2005 or his claim would expire.

Leave a Reply

Transparent Terry

Search Blog

Links to Page

Languages

Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese

My Blog Juice

Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!

Creative Commons License
With the exception of the essays entitled "TV News in a Postmodern World," all material created by Terry L. Heaton and included in this Weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.