Terry Heaton’s PoMo Blog

Email TerryRSS feed via Feedburner
What does this mean?
"Postmodernism is a change-or-be-changed world. The word is out: Reinvent yourself for the 21st century or die! Some would rather die than change."
Leonard Sweet, cultural historian.

“Reverse-compensation” a dicey matter

According to TVWeek, NBC affiliates are preparing to pay the network for the privilege of being a part of the network. Thus, the Peacock Network becomes the first of the original “big 3″ to go this route, joining Fox and the CW. ABC and CBS won’t be far behind, and soon we’ll have a whole new industry in terms of delivering network television to local markets.

For those who haven’t been around all that long, the networks used to pay the affiliates to carry their programming. It was called “network compensation,” and it’s been shrinking every year. When the nets discovered they didn’t need the affiliates to distribute programming, the day of “reverse-compensation” was inevitable.

It comes at a time when affiliate groups can least afford it, and you have to ask yourself where it will all end. One thought about that is to examine the world of syndicated programming, where the best options go to the highest bidders. If affiliates have to pay for their programming, they ought to have the right to shop for the best that’s available, and that would mean, among other things, that broadcasters with deep pockets could improve their lot in local markets simply by buying the best line-up. Contrariwise, the networks could shop their wares to the strongest stations and negotiate the compensation.

In the long run, however, this is mostly irrelevant, for the direct-to-consumer model is here to stay. Personally, I like to surf, but I know people who only watch that which they obtain online, whether through options like hulu.com or iTunes.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb

3 Responses to ““Reverse-compensation” a dicey matter”

  1. tdc Says:

    “personally, i like to surf…”

    strange, i never knew you were a surfer.

    i like to surf but my friends say the ones and twos of waikiki don’t really qualify as “real” waves.

  2. Terry Says:

    Cute. When I was 18, I was one of the founders of the Great Lakes Surfing Association. True. They do surf on Lake Michigan.

  3. Mark Shepherd Says:

    How long will it be before local station owners realize the networks don’t need them… and neither do the syndicators? The only real answer is to produce your own content, including, but not limited to, news.

Leave a Reply

 
Transparent Terry
Search Blog


>
Links to Page

Languages
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese

Feeds

My Blog Juice

Creative Commons License
With the exception of the essays entitled "TV News in a Postmodern World," all material created by Terry L. Heaton and included in this Weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.