<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real battle in the TV vs YouTube war</title>
	<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Media culture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links connected to the topic Youtube vs. Boobtube</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-51985</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-51985</guid>
					<description>[...] http://mashable.com/2006/11/27/youtube-vs-tv/ http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href='http://mashable.com/2006/11/27/youtube-vs-tv/' rel='nofollow'>http://mashable.com/2006/11/27/youtube-vs-tv/</a> <a href='http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: I write it; you own it; that&#8217;s not right &#171; Dawn of the Participation Age</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-10376</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-10376</guid>
					<description>[...] I write it; you own it; that&#8217;s not&#160;right Filed under: Content business &#8212; John McCann @ 1:33 pm   A recent post by Terry Heaton delves into the issues behind the attempts by Google to convince the TV networks, and other copyright holders, to put their content on YouTube. According to Heaton, this situation is part of a bigger cultural and legal issue. &#8220;There is more at stake in this battle than meets the eye, for the very nature of contemporary copyright law is what’s being challenged. It’s a touchpoint between the controlled distribution of modernism and the shared distribution of postmodernism, and I don’t think anybody really knows where it’s all heading. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I write it; you own it; that&#8217;s not&nbsp;right Filed under: Content business &#8212; John McCann @ 1:33 pm   A recent post by Terry Heaton delves into the issues behind the attempts by Google to convince the TV networks, and other copyright holders, to put their content on YouTube. According to Heaton, this situation is part of a bigger cultural and legal issue. &#8220;There is more at stake in this battle than meets the eye, for the very nature of contemporary copyright law is what’s being challenged. It’s a touchpoint between the controlled distribution of modernism and the shared distribution of postmodernism, and I don’t think anybody really knows where it’s all heading. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-10109</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-10109</guid>
					<description>Terry:

I think your last paragraph sums it up nicely.  All across the media landscape, companies are fighting to control intellectual property.  That's understandable.  After all, a big part of copyright/IP protections are that they give creators incentives to create.  But somehow that's got to be balanced with the realities of the age we're in, where consumers can appropriate and reshape content at will.  Interesting that IBM today called for media companies to free their content.  See the MediaPost article here: http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&#38;s=55916&#38;Nid=27671&#38;p=364453</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry:</p>
<p>I think your last paragraph sums it up nicely.  All across the media landscape, companies are fighting to control intellectual property.  That&#8217;s understandable.  After all, a big part of copyright/IP protections are that they give creators incentives to create.  But somehow that&#8217;s got to be balanced with the realities of the age we&#8217;re in, where consumers can appropriate and reshape content at will.  Interesting that IBM today called for media companies to free their content.  See the MediaPost article here: <a href='http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=55916&amp;Nid=27671&amp;p=364453' rel='nofollow'>http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=55916&amp;Nid=27671&amp;p=364453</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fredrick</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-9851</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/the-real-battle-in-the-tv-vs-youtube-war/#comment-9851</guid>
					<description>You can get free access into that Wall Street Journal article with a netpass from: http://news.congoo.com

This was in several blogs last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get free access into that Wall Street Journal article with a netpass from: <a href='http://news.congoo.com' rel='nofollow'>http://news.congoo.com</a></p>
<p>This was in several blogs last week.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
