<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will media companies unbundle with Flowww?</title>
	<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/will-media-companies-unbundle-with-flowww/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John L</title>
		<link>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/will-media-companies-unbundle-with-flowww/#comment-179227</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thepomoblog.com/archive/will-media-companies-unbundle-with-flowww/#comment-179227</guid>
					<description>I like your thinking.  It would be neat if all rss readers showed a site preview, ads included.  Or if the content in this structure could be syndicated.

RSS is making all content too plain and the feeds are all starting to look the same-- to the point where I entirely forget who the source is.  

The look and feel and essence are lost....    something like flowww could change that, if we are lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your thinking.  It would be neat if all rss readers showed a site preview, ads included.  Or if the content in this structure could be syndicated.</p>
<p>RSS is making all content too plain and the feeds are all starting to look the same&#8211; to the point where I entirely forget who the source is.  </p>
<p>The look and feel and essence are lost&#8230;.    something like flowww could change that, if we are lucky.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
